Stakeholder Opinions: Primary Brain Cancer
Scope
Report Highlights
Reasons to Purchase
Table of Contents
- CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - page 3
- Scope - page 3
- Datamonitor insight into the brain cancer market - page 4
- CHAPTER 2 INTRODUCTION: A DIVERSE RANGE OF HETEROGENOUS NEOPLASMS - page 13
- Epidemiology - page 15
- Staging and classification systems for primary brain tumors - page 21
- TNM staging system is of limited utility - page 21
- WHO classifies brain tumors by histological origin of tumor cell - page 21
- WHO grading of brain tumors provides prognostic utility - page 24
- Gliomas account for 77% of the malignant brain tumors - page 24
- Astrocytomas - page 25
- Oligodendrogliomas - page 27
- Mixed gliomas - page 27
- Prior cranial irradiation and genetic predisposition are the only established risk-factors for brain tumor development - page 28
- Mobile/cellular phones - page 28
- Cranial radiation - page 29
- Occupational exposure - page 29
- Gender - page 29
- Genetic predisposition - page 29
- Prognosis for glioma patients is primarily related to histological grade, age and performance status - page 31
- For treatment purposes patients may be stratified according to the recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classification. - page 32
- Some molecular markers have demonstrated prognostic utility regarding response to chemotherapy - page 34
- Loss of heterozygosity indicates response to lumustine, procarbazine and vincristine therapy in oligodendroglioma - page 34
- Hypermethylation of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promotor indictates increased sensitivity to temozololimide in glioblastoma patients - page 35
- CHAPTER 3 CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS - page 38
- Supportive care - page 39
- Surgical options for glioma patients - page 40
- Radiotherapy options for glioma patients - page 40
- Treatment of low-grade glioma - page 43
- The 'gold-standard' treatment for low-grade glioma may be changing - page 44
- No clinical benefit of immediate radiation therapy following surgery for low-grade glioma - page 45
- No radiotherapy dose-response in patients with low-grade glioma - page 45
- Treatment of glioblastoma - page 46
- Schering-Plough's temozolomide (Temodal/Temodar) has rapidly become the new gold standard of care for glioblastoma - page 48
- Temozolomide (Temodar, Temodal), Schering-Plough - page 49
- Temozolomide with radiotherapy confers increased survival in glioblastoma patients - page 49
- Temozolomide has a manageable toxicity profile - page 50
- Temozolomide benefits from its oral availability - page 50
- Temozolomide, European Medicines Agency application approved June 2005 - page 51
- CHAPTER 4 UNMET NEEDS - page 52
- Disruption of the bloob-brain barrier can cloud accuracy of Imaging techniques - page 52
- Imaging - page 52
- Drug penetration through the blood brain barrier continues to hamper drug development - page 53
- Adverse interaction of supportive therapy with definitive therapy drugs - page 54
- Measuring tumor response requires evolution in the era of targeted treatment - page 55
- Improvements in clinical trial design necessary - page 57
- Alternative Phase II trial design - page 58
- Temozolomide 'raises the bar' as suitable clinical endpoints - page 58
- Effective agents needed to counter inevitable tumor recurrence - page 59
- Costs associated with treating glioma patients - page 59
- Despite low incidence brain cancer exerts significant costs on healthcare systems - page 59
- Inpatient stays are the main driver of costs associated with brain cancer patients - page 63
- Agents in development for glioma benefit from fast track and orphan drug status - page 65
- Disruption of the bloob-brain barrier can cloud accuracy of Imaging techniques - page 52
- CHAPTER 5 PIPELINE DRUGS - page 67
- Cotara (131I-ch, TNT-1B, 131I-TNT), Peregrine Pharmaceuticals - page 67
- Peregrine has entered collaboration with New Approaches to Brain Tumor Therapy (NABTT) for pivotal registration trial - page 68
- Phase II trials of Cotara demonstrated 100% increase in time-to-progression compared to the historical value of eight weeks - page 69
- Phase III trial designed to minimize inconvenience and reduce costs. - page 69
- Low physician awareness and lack of oncology experience may hinder Cotara's uptake - page 69
- Cintredekin besudotox (IL13-PE38; NK-408), Neopharm - page 70
- Phase I/II trial data formed the basis for Phase III trial design - page 70
- Peritumoral drug delivery offers increased overall survival - page 71
- First review of the safety data for the PRECISE trial was carried out in May 2005 - page 71
- IL13-PE38QQR impressive survival results required - page 72
- Nimotuzumab (TheraCIM h-R3: as Theraloc in Europe), YM Biosciences/Center of Molecular Immunology/Oncoscience - page 72
- Postive efficacy and favorable toxicity data for Phase II trial results of nimotuzumab - page 73
- Nimotuzumab, Phase III trial result required to verify the efficacy of this agent - page 73
- TransMID (XR-311), Xenova - page 74
- Active clinical trial program and fast-track designation will drive development - page 74
- Cumbersome infusion schedule may detract from broad clinical benefit - page 75
- Phase II trial drugs - page 76
- Enzastaurin (LY-317615; 317615.2HCI), Eli Lilly - page 77
- Enzastaurin demonstrates clinical benefit in recurrent or progressive glioma - page 77
- Overall enzastaurin had a favorable safety profile - page 78
- Potential association of anti-cogulation therapy, enzastaurin and intratumoral bleeds - page 78
- Phase III trials for enzastaurin planned - page 79
- Significant uptake expected if Phase III trial results are positive - page 79
- Erlotinib (Tarceva, Genentech/Roche/OSI) - page 80
- Modest single agent activity in glioblastoma - page 80
- Combining erlotinib with radiation appears to demonstrate acceptable toxicity - page 81
- Race is on to identify biomarkers predictive of response - page 82
- High EGFR expression and low levels of phosphorylated Akt may be suggestive of responder groups to erlotinib. - page 83
- Further investigations need to be carried out to confirm these associations - page 83
- Erlotinib will achieve significant uptake if efficacy shown - page 83
- Enzastaurin (LY-317615; 317615.2HCI), Eli Lilly - page 77
- Cotara (131I-ch, TNT-1B, 131I-TNT), Peregrine Pharmaceuticals - page 67
- CHAPTER 6 OPINION LEADER TRANSCRIPTS - page 85
- Contributing experts - page 85
- European opinion leader 1 - page 86
- European opinion leader 2 - page 94
- US opinion leader 1 - page 102
- US opinion leader 2 - page 115
- US opinion leader 3 - page 126
- Contributing experts - page 85
- CHAPTER 7 APPENDIX - page 132
- References - page 132
- Methodology - epidemiology - page 136
- Integrity of incidence data - page 136
- Static incidence data - page 136
- List of tables - page 138
- List of figures - page 140
- About Datamonitor - page 141
- About Datamonitor Healthcare - page 141
- Datamonitor Healthcare's research and analysis methodologies - page 142
- Datamonitor Healthcare's therapy area capabilities - page 142
- About the Oncology analysis team - page 143
- Disclaimer - page 144
- List of Tables
- Table 1: Datamonitor estimates of glioblastoma incidence across the seven major markets, 2003-15 - page 8
- Table 2: Crude incidence rates of primary brain cancer in the seven major markets - page 16
- Table 3: Datamonitor estimates of the incidence of malignant brain cancer in the seven major markets, 2003-15 - page 17
- Table 4: Datamonitor estimates of the incidence of glioma in the seven major markets, 2003-15 - page 18
- Table 5: Datamonitor estimates of glioblastoma across the seven major markets, 2003-15 - page 20
- Table 6: Summary of nine types of brain cancer - page 23
- Table 7: WHO grading of CNS tumors - page 24
- Table 8: Summary of gliomas arising from transformation of astrocytomas - page 26
- Table 9: Summary of characteristics of oligodendrogliomas and mixed gliomas - page 27
- Table 10: Genetic predisposition to intracranial tumors - page 30
- Table 11: Relative survival rates of gliomas versus other tumor types - page 32
- Table 12: Survival estimates by RPA class - page 34
- Table 13: Methylated MGMT confers better prognosis for glioblastoma patients - page 36
- Table 14: Surgical and radiotherapy techniques used for glioma patients - page 42
- Table 15: Five- year survival rates of partial resection versus total resection in patients with low-grade glioma - page 44
- Table 16: Clinical trial results demonstrating no benefit of immediate radiotherapy and clinical benefit of low dose radiotherapy over high dose radiotherapy in low-grade glioma - page 46
- Table 17: EORTC Phase III trial results supporting FDA approval of temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma - page 50
- Table 18: Grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicity associated with temozolomide. - page 50
- Table 19: Summary of patient and control cohort demographics - page 60
- Table 20: Temozolomide sales for first quarter 2005 are 52% increased compared to first quarter 2004 - page 65
- Table 21: Phase III drugs - page 67
- Table 22: Comparison of peritumoral delivery and intratumoral delivery - page 71
- Table 23: Phase II drugs - page 76
- Table 24: Phase II trial results for enzastaurin in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas. - page 78
- Table 25: Intratumoral bleeds in patients on enzasturin may be associated with anti-coagulation therapy - page 79
- Table 26: Phase II trials of erlotinib in glioma - page 81
- Table 27: Combining erlotinib with radiation therapy demonstrates acceptable toxicity - page 82
- List of Figures
- Figure 1: Schematic diagram of the brain - page 15
- Figure 2: Datamonitor estimates of the incidence of malignant brain cancer in the seven major markets, 2003-15 - page 17
- Figure 3: Datamonitor estimates of the incidence of gliomas in the seven major markets, 2003-15 - page 18
- Figure 4: Distribution of primary brain and CNS gliomas - page 19
- Figure 5: Datamonitor estimates of glioblastoma across the seven major markets, 2003-15 - page 20
- Figure 6: Diagram illustrating the location of brain tumors - page 22
- Figure 7: Diagram illustrating the six RPA classes for glioma patients - page 33
- Figure 8: Current treatment options for primary brain cancer patients - page 39
- Figure 9: Mean monthly rate of emergency room visits, hospitalizations and length of stay for brain cancer patients versus controls - page 61
- Figure 10: Mean monthly rate of outpatient radiology and laboratory procedures office visits and pharmacy drugs dispensed in brain cancer patients and cancer-free controls - page 62
- Figure 11: Inpatient stays drive the costs associated with brain cancer patients - page 63
- Figure 12: Comparison of the mean monthly and overall healthcare costs between brain cancer patients and controls - page 64
Other users found this report page using the following search terms: brain cancer glioma brain cancer glioblastoma market temozolomide diagram tumor primary enzastaurin prognosis
If you can't find a report that meets your needs contact LeadDiscovery. We are one of the few report providers with extensive drug development experience and we frequently use this knowledge to help clients source the most appropriate reports or produce reports for them from scratch.