Regulator Perceptions in Cancer - Evolving opinions about the oncology drug approval process

Questions: Discounts, Updates etc.

Price: $1,900.00

Publication Date: 2006-11-08

Order Online Now

People that purchased this report also purchased:

Contact LeadDiscovery

  • If you have questions about this report
  • To find out if you qualify for a discount
  • Want a more up to date version
  • Can't find a report that meets your needs
Search all reports

Keywords:

Boolean terms AND, OR, NOT can be used. Phrases should be entered within quotes. For wildcards use an *

The oncology therapy area is unlikely to be spared from the heightened conservatism currently sweeping the regulatory environment. This is evidenced by the increased scrutiny with which the FDA appraises accelerated approval applications, particularly in light of the 2005 withdrawal of AstraZeneca's Iressa.


Scope

  • Examine the function and process of EU and US regulatory advisory committees and the dynamics of their relationship with the FDA or EU Commission.
  • Regulator perceptions on the evolution of endpoint designation and clinical trial design for oncology drugs.
  • Opinions on biomarker validation in the development of novel cancer treatments.
  • The impact of the increasingly more conservative regulatory environment on accelerated approvals in oncology.


    • Report Highlights
    The FDA's accelerated approval program is under intense scrutiny following the Vioxx debacle and the market withdrawal of AstraZeneca's Iressa. Developers need to be cognizant of the fact that seeking regulatory approval via this expedited route may be come increasingly more challenging.

    The identification and validation of more robust and reliable surrogate endpoints will help streamline and expedite the drug development process, possibly even negating the need for cumbersome and slow-to-recruit post-marketing studies for drugs that have realized accelerated approval.

    Regulators are enthusiastic about adaptive clinical trial designs that employ novel statistical approaches to help drive efficiencies in the oncology drug development process.


    Reasons to Purchase

  • Gauge regulator opinion on aspects of pharmacovigilance as it relates to the oncology drug approval process.
  • Ascertain regulator receptiveness to innovations in oncology clinical trial design and endpoint designation.
  • Determine what other kinds of 'restructuring', in terms of legal and regulatory rules, would help drive efficiencies in oncology drug development.

    • Table of Contents

    Other users found this report page using the following search terms: oncology regulatory affairs clinicaltrials oncology drugs scrutiny payers

    If you can't find a report that meets your needs contact LeadDiscovery. We are one of the few report providers with extensive drug development experience and we frequently use this knowledge to help clients source the most appropriate reports or produce reports for them from scratch.