Advaxis lights up the future for cervical cancer and maybe some head and neck cancers

24th February 2010 17:44

Note: We have just uploaded the following report relating to this editorial:

Pipeline Insight: Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines - Prospect of first approval set to reinvigorate interest from major companies

-----------------------------------

Invasive carcinoma of the cervix is the second most common cancer in women worldwide with over 450,000 new cases and 230,000 deaths annually, most of them occurring in developing countries. Persistent infection with high-oncogenic risk HPV, especially HPV16 and HPV18 are common underlying causes of malignant lesions, accounting for over 70% of Invasive carcinoma of the cervix and over 50% of high-grade precursor lesions.

According to our 2007 feature Gynecological Cancers - Niche opportunities in advanced disease the incidence of cervical cancer is set to fall with the advent of prophylactic HPV vaccines. However cervical cancer will remain a problem for many years for two reasons. Firstly, prophylactic vaccines are unlikely to offer significant benefit to those women already infected with HPV. Consequently cervical cancer will continue to be a problem in women who were sexually active prior to the introduction of the vaccine. Secondly, worldwide implementation of such vaccines remains a challenge.

Given that cervical cancer will continue to be a problem it is particularly disappointing that few advances in this area of oncology have been witnessed over recent years. The best hope for women at risk of cervical cancer is early detection. Prognosis for women with early stage disease is good with cure rates of 60%-80% and fortunately there have been advances in diagnostics. For example DailyUpdates reported news from BD Diagnostics 2008 that the FDA had approved its FocalPoint GS imaging system [press release]. In May 2009 we also reported that Israeli company Zetiq had demonstrated improvements over Pap staining. Pharmacological options remain in a state of relative inertia however.

According NCCN guidelines the first line approach to later stage disease remains radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Response rates are quite low (20%-30%) and complete responses rare; overall survival with cisplatin is 6-9 months. Second line treatments are chemotherapeutic and associated with limited efficacy and significant toxicity. There is an obvious need for more targeted therapy that can offer improvements over cisplatin and possibly alternatives/adjuncts to surgery and radiotherapy.

With the exception of SRI International's cytotoxin, tirapazamine and PharmaMar's Zalypsis in (Phase 3 and 2 respectively) little development is being seen in the form of small molecules. Instead most activity is from the biologics sector. YM Bioscience is developing EGFR antibody, nimotuzumab, but by far the greatest efforts are currently being focussed on therapeutic vaccines (for background on this field see our 2007 feature, World market for cancer vaccines 2007-2012).

To our knowledge four candidates are currently in the clinic for cervical cancer or the premalignant disease, cervical intraepithelial neoplasias (CIN). Inovio is developing a DNA vaccine targeting E6 and E7 proteins of HPV16 and HPV18, VGX-3100 for the treatment of CIN. This candidate is in Phase 1 development. More advanced is Roche's RG-3484, a modified vaccinia Ankara vaccine expressing E6 and E7 along with IL-2. Phase 2 trials opened last year, again focusing on CIN. A third vaccine is being developed by ISA Pharmaceuticals. In contrast to the Inovio and Roche vaccines this candidate is being developed for both CIN (Phase 2) and cervical cancer (Phase 1).

Today's edition of DailyUpdates features a paper describing a fourth therapeutic vaccine in development for the treatment of cervical cancer, Advaxis' ADXS11-001 (formerly Lovaxin C). The technology being developed by Advaxis differs from other thereapeutic vaccines as it is the only live bacterial vaccine currently in clinical trials. It is based upon attenuated, bioengineered Listeria monocytogenes that provides very strong stimulation of innate immunity as well as both arms of the adaptive immune system, alters the tumor microenvironment to remove regulatory T cells (Tregs) and Myeloid Derived Suppressor Cells (MDSC) that are sources of immune inhibition, increases the pool of mature immune cells, facilitates migration of immune cells into tumors, and other effects.

The paper featured today describes data from a Phase 1 study in which the vaccine was administered safely to women with cervical cancer and who had failed surgical, radiation and/or chemotherapeutic intervention. Patients were inoculated twice, at day 1 and day 22; the protocol required administration of antibiotics five days post-inoculation to attenuate the live vaccine. Adverse events were generally flu-like and transient.

The women recruited to the study would normally be expected to have a median survival of only 6 months with a 1 year survival of 5%. In this study, the median survival was doubled and the 1 year survival increased 10-fold. Remarkably, Advaxis recently reported updated data showing that 2 of 13 patients were alive at 3 years.

The data reported in the present study are fascinating, especially given the advance stage of disease and the fact that responses were seen with just two inoculations. Further studies, perhaps with booster vaccinations built into the protocols are awaited with great interest. In addition the promise shown in the present study suggests that evaluation of the vaccine in earlier stage CIN may be worthwhile. LeadDiscovery understands that further trials are planned for this year - one a Phase 2 study of cervical cancer patients; another a study of CIN patients.

Finally, a paper was published by Maxwell et al last year in the journal head and neck linking HPV to a rare head and neck cancer, nasopharyngeal carcinoma. We understand that a further trial is planned evaluating ADXS11-001 in this disease. This is not only of great clinical importance, it may also be of commercial importance. Advaxis failed to gain orphan drug status from the FDA last year on a cervical cancer indication. The company may be able to refile for an orphan indication on this new indication (for further information on head and neck cancer, including pharyngeal cancers read Stakeholder Opinions: Head and Neck Cancer).

<< Back to Editorials