Related Industry Reports:
- Cancer Supportive Care Products Market to 2016 - Market is Expected to Decline after 2014 Due to Generic Erosion and Entry of Biosimilars
- Clinical Trial Recruitment Strategies in Oncology - Online Recruitment Methods and Use of IT - enabled Patient Management Systems will Reduce Recruitment Time and Cost
- The Future of Oncology Therapeutics - Market Forecasts to 2015, Competitive Benchmarking, Product Pipeline and Deals Analysis
A phase I/II trial of vorinostat in combination with 5-fluorouracil in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who previously failed 5-FU-based chemotherapy.
Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology 2010 Jan 9; In press
Wilson P PM, El-Khoueiry A, Iqbal S, Fazzone W, Labonte M MJ, Groshen S, Yang D, Danenberg K KD, Cole S, Kornacki M, Ladner R RD, Lenz H HJ
Department of Pathology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA.
PURPOSE: We conducted a phase I/II clinical trial to determine the safety and feasibility of combining vorinostat with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and elevated intratumoral thymidylate synthase (TS). METHODS: Patients with mCRC who had failed all standard therapeutic options were eligible. Intratumoral TS mRNA expression and peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) histone acetylation were measured before and after 6 consecutive days of vorinostat treatment at 400 mg PO daily. 5-FU/LV were given on days 6 and 7 and repeated every 2 weeks, along with continuous daily vorinostat. Dose escalation occurred in cohorts of three to six patients. RESULTS: Ten patients were enrolled. Three dose levels were explored in the phase I portion of the study. Two dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed at the starting dose level, which resulted in dose de-escalation to levels -1 and -2. Given the occurrence of two DLTs at each of the dose levels, we were unable to establish a maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Two patients achieved significant disease stabilization for 4 and 6 months. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities included fatigue, thrombocytopenia and mucositis. Intratumoral TS downregulation >/=50% was observed in one patient only. Acetylation of histone 3 was observed in PBMCs following vorinostat treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The study failed to establish a MTD and was terminated. The presence of PBMC histone acetylation indicates biological activity of vorinostat, however, consistent reductions in intratumoral TS mRNA were not observed. Alternate vorinostat dose-scheduling may alleviate the toxicity and achieve optimal TS downregulation.
Keywords: vorinostat colorectal cancer 5-FU chemotherapy
